4.8 Article

The greenhouse gas emissions of an electrified vehicle combined with renewable fuels: Life cycle assessment and policy implications

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 289, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116621

关键词

Electric vehicles; Renewable fuels; Life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions

资金

  1. Swedish Energy Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that using renewable fuels can reduce the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of vehicles more effectively than a low carbon electricity mix. Plug-in hybrid vehicles may be more beneficial in achieving more ambitious climate goals for the automotive sector compared to battery-electric vehicles. Current climate policy instruments are inadequate in minimizing the climate impact of the automotive sector.
A life cycle assessment is presented for a current vehicle?s greenhouse gas impact when using a combination of electrification and renewable fuels. Three degrees of electrification are considered: a hybrid electric vehicle, a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle, and a battery-electric vehicle. These are combined with fuels with various degrees of renewable content, representing a fossil fuel, a first-generation biofuel and a second-generation biofuel. For charging, the 2020 European electricity mix is used and compared with an electricity mix of low greenhouse-gas intensity. Renewable fuels are found to have a greater potential to reduce the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions than a low carbon electricity mix. The results are discussed in terms of the supply potential for renewable fuels on the fleet level. It is found that plug-in hybrid vehicles may enable the automotive sector to reach more ambitious climate goals than battery-electric vehicles. An assessment is also made of how the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions compare with the emissions as measured by current policy instruments. The discrepancies indicate that current climate policy instruments are inadequate for minimizing the automotive sector?s climate impact and suggestions for improvements are made.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据