4.7 Article

Preparation of high-performance silico-aluminophosphate geopolymers using fly ash and metakaolin as raw materials

期刊

APPLIED CLAY SCIENCE
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2021.106019

关键词

Metakaolin; Fly ash; Phosphoric acid; Geopolymers

资金

  1. National Special Support for HighLevel Personnel
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41972045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized SAP geopolymers using FA and found that increasing FA content shortened setting time but decreased compressive strength. High FA proportion led to lack of active aluminum, formation of ACP, and ultimately decreased compressive strength.
Silico-aluminophosphate (SAP) geopolymers were synthesized by using metakaolin (MK) and a high content of fly ash (FA) for the first time. With the increase in the FA mass fraction in the raw materials from 50% to 100%, the setting time of the SAP geopolymers was shortened and their compressive strength was decreased. The effects of the FA content on the SAP geopolymers composition and microstructure were investigated. The results showed that a high FA proportion caused the lack of active aluminum, which led to excess phosphate acid reacting with the calcium from FA. The fast formation of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) shortened the initial setting time through the consumption of water. However, after long-term aging, ACP transformed into needle- and slicelike nanoparticles, which decreased the compressive strength of the resulting geopolymers. Moreover, MK supplied active aluminum to increase the water-containing -Si-O-Al-O-P- network (SAP gel). The SAP gel contributed to the compressive strength enhancement and prevented the ACP transformation; however, it prolonged the final setting time, due to the slow polycondensation of SAP gel. These results indicate that a desirable setting time and compressive strength of the SAP geopolymers can be achieved by adjusting the FA and MK contents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据