4.8 Article

The effects of support morphology on the performance of Pt/CeO2 catalysts for the low temperature steam reforming of ethanol

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119757

关键词

Hydrogen production; Steam reforming of ethanol at low temperature; Pt/CeO2 catalyst; Ceria morphology; Deactivation mechanism

资金

  1. CAPES
  2. program: RECEARCH PROGRAMS OF EXCELLENCE IKY/SIEMENS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted on Pt/CeO2 catalysts with different support morphologies for low temperature ethanol steam reforming, revealing that support morphology influences certain reaction routes, while the reaction scheme remains the same regardless of the support. At 573K, Pt/CeO2- PPT exhibited rapid deactivation, while Pt/CeO2- NR remained rather stable. XPS surface analysis showed significant Pt reduction on CeO2 nanorods at 573K, leading to the reduction of Ce4+ into Ce3+.
A series of Pt/CeO2 catalysts with different support morphologies was studied for the low temperature ethanol steam reforming. Different ceria nanostructures (nanocube_NC, nanorod_NR and flower-like_FL) were prepared by the hydrothermal method and are compared with CeO2 obtained by precipitation. Support morphology was found to influence certain reaction routes, even though the reaction scheme was the same regardless of the support. Concerning catalyst stability at 573 K, Pt/CeO2- PPT exhibited rapid deactivation, whereas Pt/CeO2- NR remained rather stable. XPS surface analysis before and after reaction at 573 K revealed significant degree of Pt reduction on CeO2 nanorods, directly related to the reduction of Ce4+ into Ce3+. DRIFTS experiments under reaction conditions for 5 h, revealed an accumulation of acetates on the Pt/CeO2- PPT catalyst, likely due to the imbalance between the rate of acetate species decomposition to CHx (not facilitated over Ptd(+) of the catalyst with the lower Pt dispersion), and their desorption as CH4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据