4.8 Article

In situ coupling of NiFe nanoparticles with N-doped carbon nanofibers for Zn-air batteries driven water splitting

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119856

关键词

Bifunctional electrocatalyst; Flexible Zn-air battery; Water splitting; Synergistic effect; In-situ coupling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [91963109]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019kfyRCPY100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A flexible 3D free-standing bifunctional electrode, NiFe/NCNF/CC, was successfully constructed by in-situ coupling of NiFe nanoparticles and N-doped carbon nanofibers on carbon cloth. This electrode exhibits efficient and stable ORR and OER performance, and showed high power density and excellent charge/discharge stability in Zinc-air battery assembly. Additionally, two liquid Zinc-air batteries were used for stable power supply in a self-assembled water-splitting device.
A flexible 3D free-standing bifunctional electrode has been successfully constructed by in-situ coupling of NiFe nanoparticles and N-doped carbon nanofibers on carbon cloth (NiFe/NCNF/CC). The 3D network structure is formed by the cross-linking of slender N-doped carbon nanofibers, which provides large specific surface area and ensures fast electron/charge transfer. The in-situ coupling in 3D space of NiFe particles and N-doped carbon nanofibers provide sufficient and stable reactive sites for both OER and ORR. Therefore, NiFe/NCNF/CC electrode exhibits efficient and stable ORR and OER performance. The NiFe/NCNF/CC electrode assembled Zinc-air battery exhibits a high power density of 140.1 mW cm(-2) and excellent charge/discharge stability for 700 cycles. Interestingly, the flexible Zinc-air battery delivers flexible and foldable mechanical properties and a low voltage gap of 0.55 V at 1.0 mA cm(-2). Furthermore, two liquid Zinc-air batteries are served as stable power for the selfassembled water-splitting device.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据