4.4 Article

Formulation and Characterization of Chia (Salvia hispanica) Seed Spread with Incorporation of Sesame (Sesamum indicum) Seed, Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Seed, and Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) Seed

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 193, 期 6, 页码 1898-1908

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-021-03499-8

关键词

Spread; Chia; Watermelon; Sesame; Pumpkin; Antioxidant

资金

  1. SOCSAT lab, IIEST, Shibpur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on producing and formulating plant-based spread products using a combination of chia seed, sesame seed, watermelon seed, and pumpkin seed, with olive oil, resulting in superior quality butter-like spreads with high antioxidant and nutrient content.
The work aims at the production and formulation of plant-based nutritionally enriched butter-like spread products using chia seed, sesame seed, watermelon seed, and pumpkin seed in different ratios, with incorporation of olive oil. The formulated spread butters COB (chia + olive oil), CSOB (chia + sesame + olive oil), CWOB (chia + watermelon + olive oil), and CPOB (chia + pumpkin + olive oil) are of superior quality due to its antioxidant and nutrient content. The antioxidant property of all the formulated spread butter is characterized by total phenolic content (TPC), DPPH free radical scavenging activity, and FRAP assay and the results indicated that CSOB has the highest TPC value of 68.73 +/- 0.01 mu g GAE/ml and CWOB has the highest DPPH and FRAP activity of 52.30 +/- 0.01% and 51.01 +/- 0.01 mu g of AAE/ml, respectively. The physicochemical properties of all the formulated butter was also analyzed via acid value, peroxide value, and totox value and the results were satisfactory with CPOB having the lowest Totox value of 2.25 +/- 0.01. Functional properties of the spread butter are also investigated and the results were satisfactory. All the formulated butters are medicinally and nutritionally beneficial, and it can be used as an alternative to the conventional one.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据