4.5 Article

QUANTIFYING THE EFFECTS OF PHOTOREACTIVE DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER ON METHYLMERCURY PHOTODEMETHYLATION RATES IN FRESHWATERS

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1493-1502

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3690

关键词

Methylmercury; Mercury; Photodemethylation; Dissolved organic matter; Carbon

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. CREATE scholarship
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Parks Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study examined potential effects of seasonal variations in photoreactive dissolved organic matter (DOM) on methylmercury (MeHg) photodemethylation rates in freshwaters. A series of controlled experiments was carried out using natural and photochemically preconditioned DOM in water collected from 1 lake in June, August, and October. Natural DOM concentrations doubled between June and August (10.2-21.2 mg CL-1) and then remained stable into October (19.4 mg C L-1). Correspondingly, MeHg concentrations peaked in August (0.42 ng L-1), along with absorbances at 350 nm and 254 nm. Up to 70% of MeHg was photodemethylated in the short 48-h irradiation experiments, with June having significantly higher rates than the other sampling months (p < 0.001). Photodemethylation rate constants were not affected by photoreactive DOM, nor were they affected by initial MeHg concentrations (p > 0.10). However, MeHg photodemethylation efficiencies (quantified in moles MeHg lost/moles photon absorbed) were higher in treatments with less photoreactive DOM. Congruently, MeHg photodemethylation efficiencies also decreased over summer by up to 10 times across treatments in association with increased photoreactive DOM, and were negatively correlated with DOM concentration. These results suggest that an important driver of MeHg photodemethylation is the interplay between MeHg and DOM, with greater potential for photodemethylation in freshwaters with more photobleached DOM and lower DOM content. (C) 2016 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据