4.7 Article

EdU Incorporation To Assess Cell Proliferation and Drug Susceptibility in Naegleria fowleri

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00017-21

关键词

5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine; Naegleria fowleri; drug discovery

资金

  1. NIH [R03AI149097, S10OD021719, T32 AI060546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study validated alternative methods for assessing cell proliferation in Naegleria fowleri and developed a new drug screening assay. EdU incorporation was shown to be a complementary method for drug discovery for these neglected pathogens.
Naegleria fowleri is a pathogenic free-living amoeba that is commonly found in warm freshwater and can cause a rapidly fulminant disease known as primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM). New drugs are urgently needed to treat PAM, as the fatality rate is >97%. Until recently, few advances have been made in the discovery of new drugs for N. fowleri, and one drawback is the lack of validated tools and methods to enhance drug discovery and diagnostics research. In this study, we aimed to validate alternative methods to assess cell proliferation that are commonly used for other cell types and develop a novel drug screening assay to evaluate drug efficacy on N. fowleri replication. EdU (5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine) is a pyrimidine analog of thymidine that can be used as a quantitative endpoint for cell proliferation. EdU incorporation is detected via a copper catalyzed click reaction with an Alexa Fluor-linked azide. EdU incorporation in replicating N. fowleri was validated using fluorescence microscopy, and quantitative methods for assessing EdU incorporation were developed by using an imaging flow cytometer. Currently used PAM therapeutics inhibited N. fowleri replication and EdU incorporation in vitro. EdA (7-deaza-2'-deoxy-7-ethynyladenosine), an adenine analog, also was incorporated by N. fowleri but was more cytotoxic than EdU. In summary, EdU incorporation could be used as a complimentary method for drug discovery for these neglected pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据