4.5 Article

THE HERBICIDE ATRAZINE INDUCES HYPERACTIVITY AND COMPROMISES TADPOLE DETECTION OF PREDATOR CHEMICAL CUES

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 2239-2244

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3377

关键词

Amphibian; Behavior; Infodisruption; Olfaction; Predation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-1241889]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM109499, R01TW010286]
  3. US Department of Agriculture (NRI) [2006-01370, 2009-35102-0543]
  4. US Environmental Protection Agency (CAREER) [83518801]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1241889] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to detect chemical cues is often critical for freshwater organisms to avoid predation and find food and mates. In particular, reduced activity and avoidance of chemical cues signaling predation risk are generally adaptive behaviors that reduce prey encounter rates with predators. The present study examined the effects of the common herbicide atrazine on the ability of Cuban tree frog (Osteopilus septentrionalis) tadpoles to detect and respond to chemical cues from larval dragonfly (Libellulidae sp.) predators. Tadpoles exposed to an estimated environmental concentration of atrazine (calculated using US Environmental Protection Agency software; measured concentration, 178 mg/L) were significantly hyperactive relative to those exposed to solvent control. In addition, control tadpoles significantly avoided predator chemical cues, but tadpoles exposed to atrazine did not. These results are consistent with previous studies that have demonstrated that ecologically relevant concentrations of atrazine can induce hyperactivity and impair the olfactory abilities of other freshwater vertebrates. The authors call for additional studies examining the role of chemical contaminants in disrupting chemical communication and the quantification of subsequent impacts on the fitness and population dynamics of wildlife. (C) 2016 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据