4.6 Review Book Chapter

Long Persistent Luminescence: A Road Map Toward Promising Future Developments in Energy and Environmental Science

期刊

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-091520-011838

关键词

persistent luminescence; inorganic phosphors; energy efficiency; built environment; lighting applications

资金

  1. European Union [764025, 678407]
  2. Italian project SOS-CITTA - Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia [2018.0499.026]
  3. PhD program in Energy and Sustainable Development at the University of Perugia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research on persistent luminescence has led to new phosphors and promising performances, paving the way for innovative solutions in various disciplines. However, there are few examples of luminescent materials being implemented in practical applications, highlighting a gap between physical-chemical approaches and actual use. Engineering solutions explore the potential benefits of luminescence in energy-efficient lighting and passive cooling of urban surfaces.
In recent decades, research on persistent luminescence has led to new phosphors and promising performances. Efforts to improve the quality of phosphors' afterglow have paved the way toward innovative solutions for many disciplines. However, there are few examples of the implementation of luminescent materials. In addition to providing a general background on persistent luminescence, the techniques used for its analysis, and its multidisciplinary potential in energy and environmental science, this article aims to explain the existing gap between the physical-chemical approach and the effective implementation of luminescent materials in larger-scale applications. It investigates engineering solutions in terms of the possible benefits of luminescence in lighting energy savings and passive cooling of urban surfaces. Finally, this article aims to reduce the abovementioned gap by suggesting what is most needed for the successful application of luminescent materials in the built environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据