4.7 Article

Induction Chemotherapy Plus Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 7208-7218

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09999-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dr. Harold J. and Claire Wanebo Endowed Research Fellowship at University of Colorado
  2. NIH/NCATS Colorado CTSA [TL1 TR002533]
  3. University of Colorado Department of Medicine Outstanding Early Scholars Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival and higher pathological complete response rate. Furthermore, in patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2015, induction chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy was also linked to a higher odds of achieving pathological complete response.
Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (nCRT) is an accepted treatment regimen for patients with potentially curable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) before nCRT is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS) when compared with patients who received nCRT alone for esophageal and GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients who received nCRT and curative-intent esophagectomy for esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma from 2006 to 2015 were included. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy start dates were used to define cohorts who received IC before nCRT (IC + nCRT) versus those who only received concurrent nCRT before surgery. Propensity weighting was conducted to balance patient, disease, and facility covariates between groups. Results 12,460 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 11,880 (95%) received nCRT and 580 (5%) received IC + nCRT. Following propensity weighting, OS was significantly improved among patients who received IC + nCRT versus nCRT (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.74-0.92; p < 0.001) with median OS for the IC + nCRT cohort of 3.38 years versus 2.45 years for nCRT. For patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2015, IC + nCRT was also associated with higher odds of pCR compared with nCRT (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.14-2.21; p = 0.007). Conclusion IC + nCRT was associated with a significant OS benefit as well as higher pCR rate in the more modern patient cohort. These results merit consideration of a sufficiently powered prospective multiinstitutional trial to further evaluate these observed differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据