4.5 Article

Critical exponents from the weak-coupling, strong-coupling and large-order parametrization of the hypergeometric (k+1Fk) approximants

期刊

ANNALS OF PHYSICS
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2021.168404

关键词

Critical exponent; Resummation technique; Hypergeometric resummation

资金

  1. Qatar National Library

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a new parametrization for hypergeometric approximants to accommodate perturbative and non-perturbative information, which has shown promising results in quantum mechanical problems. Our approach leads to accurate results with a relatively low order from perturbation series and demonstrates a clear improvement over previous six-loop results.
In this work, we suggest a new parametrization for the hypergeometric (F-k+1(k)) approximants introduced by Mera et al. (2015). The new parametrization enables the approximants to accommodate all perturbative and non-perturbative information of the divergent series as input. Also, the parametrization has been shown to account for the n! growth factor of the given perturbation series provided that one of the denominator parameters of the hypergeometric approximant takes large values. The algorithm with the new parametrization has been tested using two quantum mechanical problems where one can incorporate the weak-coupling, strong-coupling and large-order information. Accurate results have been obtained in using a relatively low order from the perturbation series. Since strong-coupling behavior is not yet known for the renormalization group functions of the O(N)-symmetric phi(4) theory, we used weak-coupling and large-order parametrization to resum the seven-loop critical exponents nu, eta and omega for N = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. In view of the recent results from six-loop resummation as well as Monte Carlo simulations and conformal bootstrap calculations, our results show a clear improvement to the six-loop results. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据