4.5 Article

COPPER AND NICKEL EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF NORTHERN LEOPARD FROG (LITHOBATES PIPIENS) TADPOLES IN FIELD-COLLECTED SMELTING EFFLUENT WATER

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 687-694

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3227

关键词

Copper; Nickel; Tailing wetlands; Northern leopard frog; Life history traits

资金

  1. Sudbury Integrated Nickel Operations-A Glencore Company
  2. Environment Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trace metals can have subtle yet chronic impacts on organisms by inducing physiological stress that reduces their survival or impedes their ability to tolerate additional environmental stressors. The toxicity literature indicates, however, that aquatic organisms react differently to trace metals depending on the environments in which they reside. The objective of the present study was to understand the response of northern leopard frog (Lithobates pipiens) larvae to ionic copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and their combination within an effluent water collected downstream of a tailings wetland area. Tadpoles were assigned randomly to 1 of 8 Cu concentrations (8-200g/L), 7 Ni concentrations (160-1200g/L), or 8 Cu and Ni combined concentrations (8:160-200:1200g/L) and showed significant differences in survival and life history traits among treatments. In the Cu and Cu and Ni combined treatments, tadpole survival decreased with increased Cu exposure starting at Cu=160g/L and in the Ni treatment, tadpole survival decreased with increased Ni exposure starting at Ni=650g/L. All Cu-exposed treatments induced a growth increase as the concentration increased, whereas the tadpoles showed a significant decrease in growth rate in Ni treatments. These contrasting outcomes suggest a plastic response to trace metals whereby tadpoles allocate energy reserves toward either escaping or coping with stress. Finally, the authors' argue that future studies will benefit from examining the impacts of multiple stressors in aquatic ecosystems to provide better environmental mitigation. (c) 2015 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据