4.5 Article

Long-term outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

期刊

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1553-1567

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04514-y

关键词

Multiple myeloma; Allogeneic stem cell transplantation; Survival; Conditioning; Graft-versus-host disease; Post-relapse survival

资金

  1. University of Helsinki
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital
  3. Blood Disease Research Foundation
  4. Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, showing that this approach can lead to long-term survival in a small subgroup of patients, and auto-allo-SCT may be considered for younger patients.
The role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in multiple myeloma is controversial. We analyzed the results of 205 patients transplanted in one center during 2000-2017. Transplantation was performed on 75 patients without a previous autologous SCT (upfront-allo), on 74 as tandem transplant (auto-allo), and on 56 patients after relapse. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 years for upfront-allo, 11.2 years for auto-allo, and 3.9 years for the relapse group (p = 0.015). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4, 2.4, and 0.9 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-relapse mortality at 5 years was 8% overall, with no significant difference between the groups. Post-relapse survival was 4.1 years for upfront-allo and auto-allo, and 2.6 years for the relapse group (p = 0.066). Survival of high-risk patients was reduced. In multivariate analysis, the auto-allo group had improved OS and chronic graft-versus-host disease was advantageous in terms of PFS, OS, and relapse incidence. Late relapses occurred in all groups. Allo-SCT resulted in long-term survival in a small subgroup of patients. Our results indicate that auto-allo-SCT is feasible and could be considered for younger patients in the upfront setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据