4.3 Review

Of mice and men - and guinea pigs?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151765

关键词

Pseudoautosomal region; NLGN4; Gametolog; Guinea pig; Genome

资金

  1. Medical School of Saarland University [HOMFOR17-19]
  2. DFG [SFB-TR152/P22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the differences between the human genome and the mouse genome, particularly the issues in generating gene research models, pointing out the absence of some genes in mice and rats.
This year marks the twentieth anniversary of the publication of the first draft of the human genome and its broad availability to the scientific community. In parallel, the annotation of the mouse genome led to the identification and analysis of countless genes by means of genetic manipulation. Today, when comparing both genomes, it might surprise that some genes are still seeking their respective homologs in either species. In this review, we aim at raising awareness for the remarkable differences between the researcher's favorite rodents, i.e., mice and rats, when it comes to the generation of rodent research models regarding genes with a particular delicate localization, namely the pseudoautosomal region on both sex chromosomes. Many of these genes are of utmost clinical relevance in humans and still miss a rodent disease model giving their absence in mice and rats or low sequence similarity compared to humans. The abundance of rodents within mammals prompted us to investigate different branches of rodents leading us to the re-discovery of the guinea pig as a mammalian research model for a distinct group of genes. (c) 2021 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据