4.3 Review

Inflammatory Indicators and Hematological Indices in Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Among Patients Receiving Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

ANGIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 9, 页码 867-877

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00033197211000492

关键词

c-reactive protein; platelet to lymphocyte ratio; neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; hematocrit; red blood cell distribution width; contrast-induced nephropathy; coronary intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strong inflammatory indicators and some hematological indices are associated with contrast-induced nephropathy, with higher CRP, hsCRP, NLR, RDW, and lower HCT showing significantly higher CIN rates, while there is no significant association between PLR and CIN risk.
Strong inflammatory indicators such as C-reactive protein (CRP), high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), and hematological indices, including platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), hematocrit (HCT), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW), may be related with contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Our meta-analysis aimed at exploring the relationship between these indicators and CIN incidence among patients undergoing coronary intervention. Clinical studies were retrieved from the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Clinical Trials, and Science Direct from their inception to June 3, 2020. Meta-analysis was performed on pooled eligible studies. Finally, 26 studies involving 29 454 patients were included. Pooled analysis revealed that patients with higher CRP (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = .02), hsCRP (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, P = .004), NLR (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20, P = .02), RDW (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19-1.53, P < .001), and lower HCT (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.97, P = .003) all exhibited significantly higher CIN rates, but there was no significant association between PLR and CIN risk (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.99-1.26, P = .07). Pre-angiography CRP/hsCRP and some hematological indices are associated with CIN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据