4.8 Article

Direct Immunodetection of Global A-to-I RNA Editing Activity with a Chemiluminescent Bioassay

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 31, 页码 17009-17017

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202102762

关键词

adenosine-to-inosine editing; bioorganic chemistry; chemiluminescence; immunoassays; RNA

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21GM134564, R01GM140657]
  2. Emory Integrated Genomics Core (EIGC) - Emory University School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study presents an EndoV-linked immunosorbency assay (EndoVLISA) for rapid measurement of global A-to-I editing signatures in cellular RNA. The method is cost-effective, straightforward, and suitable for disease detection and drug development applications.
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is a conserved eukaryotic RNAmodification that contributes to development, immune response, and overall cellular function. Here, we utilize Endonuclease V (EndoV), which binds specifically to inosine in RNA, to develop an EndoV-linked immunosorbency assay (EndoVLISA) as a rapid, plate-based chemiluminescent method for measuring global A-to-I editing signatures in cellular RNA. We first optimize and validate our assay with chemically synthesized oligonucleotides. We then demonstrate rapid detection of inosine content in treated cell lines, demonstrating equivalent performance against current standard RNA-seq approaches. Lastly, we deploy our EndoVLISA for profiling differential A-to-I RNA editing signatures in normal and diseased human tissue, illustrating the utility of our platform as a diagnostic bioassay. Together, the EndoVLISA method is cost-effective, straightforward, and utilizes common laboratory equipment, offering a highly accessible new approach for studying A-to-I editing. Moreover, the multi-well plate format makes this the first assay amenable for direct high-throughput quantification of A-to-I editing for applications in disease detection and drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据