4.8 Article

Rational Design of a Highly Selective Near-Infrared Two-Photon Fluorogenic Probe for Imaging Orthotopic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Chemotherapy

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 28, 页码 15418-15425

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202101190

关键词

activatable probes; analytical methods; fluorogenic imaging; orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma; specific substrates

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2012R1A3A2048814]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21864011, 21775162]
  3. Hainan Key Research and Development Project [ZDYF2020133]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a near-infrared two-photon fluorescent probe with high selectivity for imaging the HCC-related biomarker CE in vivo and in situ. The probe correlated well with tumor apoptosis, enabling accurate evaluation of HCC treatment status. This advancement may contribute to precision imaging-guided diagnosis and treatment evaluation of HCC in situ.
Selective fluorescence imaging of biomarkers in vivo and in situ for evaluating orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) chemotherapy remains a great challenge due to current imaging agents suffering from the potential interferences of other hydrolases. Herein, we observed that carbamate unit showed a high selectivity toward the HCC-related biomarker carboxylesterase (CE) for evaluation of treatment. A near-infrared two-photon fluorescent probe was developed to not only specially image CE activity in vivo and in situ but also target orthotopic liver tumor after systemic administration. The in vivo signals of the probe correlate well with tumor apoptosis, making it possible to evaluate the status of treatment. The probe enables the imaging of CE activity in situ with a high-resolution three-dimensional view for the first time. This study may promote advances in optical imaging approaches for precise imaging-guided diagnosis of HCC in situ and its evaluation of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据