4.8 Article

Stable Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Copper(II/I) Redox Mediators Bearing a Pentadentate Ligand

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 29, 页码 16156-16163

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202104563

关键词

copper redox mediator; dye-sensitized solar cells; energy conversion; ligand design; stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21975038, 22088102, 21902015]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20RC(3)085]
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF)
  4. Swedish Energy Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper redox mediators have been gaining interest in dye-sensitized solar cells, with recent research showing that copper complexes with pentadentate ligands demonstrate excellent performance and stability in DSCs compared to traditional bipyridyl counterparts.
In recent years, copper redox mediators have attracted growing interest in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs). However, experiments revealed that ubiquitously used Lewis-base additives in the electrolytes coordinate to the Cu-II species, which restricts further enhancement of device performance and stability. We report the application of copper complexes endowed with diamine-tripyridine pentadentate ligands, [Cu(tpe)](2+/+) (tpe=N-benzyl-N,N ',N '-tris(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethylenediamine) and [Cu(tme)](2+/+) (tme=N-benzyl-N,N ',N '-tris(6-methylpyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethylenediamine), as redox mediators in DSCs. Experimental measurements demonstrate that the coordination environment of Cu(II) complexes with pentadentate ligands remains unchanged in the presence of TBP, which is in stark contrast to the state-of-the-art bipyridyl counterpart. DSCs based on [Cu(tme)](2+/+) complexes exhibit an excellent long-term stability and maintain more than 90 % of the initial efficiency after 400 h under continuous illumination, which outperform the reference devices incorporating the bipyridyl counterpart (less than 80 %) under identical conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据