4.8 Article

E. coli Nickel-Iron Hydrogenase 1 Catalyses Non-native Reduction of Flavins: Demonstration for Alkene Hydrogenation by Old Yellow Enzyme Ene-reductases**

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 25, 页码 13824-13828

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202101186

关键词

asymmetric catalysis; biocatalysis; cofactor recycling; ene-reductase; hydrogenation

资金

  1. European Research Council [BiocatSusChem ERC-2018-CoG 819580]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/R018413/1, NIBB BB/S009787/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N013514/1]
  4. BBSRC [BB/R018413/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [EP/N013514/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new activity of the [NiFe] uptake hydrogenase 1 in Escherichia coli (Hyd1) was discovered, allowing direct reduction of the biological flavin cofactors FMN and FAD. The robust nature of Hyd1 was utilized for flavin reduction across a range of temperatures and reaction times, demonstrating potential for regenerating FMNH2 or FADH(2) and supporting asymmetric alkene reductions. High turnover frequencies and total turnover numbers were achieved during flavin recycling, showing the efficiency of this system.
A new activity for the [NiFe] uptake hydrogenase 1 of Escherichia coli (Hyd1) is presented. Direct reduction of biological flavin cofactors FMN and FAD is achieved using H-2 as a simple, completely atom-economical reductant. The robust nature of Hyd1 is exploited for flavin reduction across a broad range of temperatures (25-70 degrees C) and extended reaction times. The utility of this system as a simple, easy to implement FMNH2 or FADH(2) regenerating system is then demonstrated by supplying reduced flavin to Old Yellow Enzyme ene-reductases to support asymmetric alkene reductions with up to 100 % conversion. Hyd1 turnover frequencies up to 20.4 min(-1) and total turnover numbers up to 20 200 were recorded during flavin recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据