4.8 Article

Target-Dependent Gating of Nanopores Integrated with H-Cell: Toward A General Platform for Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 93, 期 12, 页码 5001-5004

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00444

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976129, 21974060]
  2. Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project [LGF19B050002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel target-dependent gating-based PEC bioanalysis protocol, which utilizes sandwich immunocomplexation and enzymatic generation of biocatalytic precipitation to regulate the diffusion of the target substance in nanopores. The protocol demonstrates good performance in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility, and efficient reutilization of the working electrode, thus providing a potential general PEC analytical platform for various other targets of interest.
Herein we present a proof-of-concept study of target-dependent gating of nanopores for general photoelectrochemical (PEC) bioanalysis in an H-cell. The model system was constructed upon a left chamber containing ascorbic acid (AA), the antibody modified porous anodic alumina (AAO) membrane separator, and a right chamber placed with the three-electrode system. The sandwich immunocomplexation and the associated enzymatic generation of biocatalytic precipitation (BCP) in the AAO nanopores would regulate the diffusion of AA from the left cell to the right cell, leading to a varied photocurrent response of the ZnInS nanoflakes photoelectrode. Exemplified by fatty-acid-banding protein (FABP) as the target, the as-developed protocol achieved good performance in terms of sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility, as well as efficient reutilization of the working electrode. On the basis of an H-cell, this work features a new protocol of target-dependent gating-based PEC bioanalysis, which can serve as a general PEC analytical platform for various other targets of interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据