4.5 Article

Comparison of Anti-Dengue and Anti-Zika IgG on a Plasmonic Gold Platform with Neutralization Testing

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC TROP MED & HYGIENE
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1449

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R21 AI131689, K08 AI110528]
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACYT) in Paraguay [PVCT16-66, PVCT1765]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Testing for dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) using a multiplex serological platform showed good agreement with traditional testing methods, with 51.2% of patients in Paraguay found to have acute DENV infections. Antibody cross-reactivity confounded testing, but quantitative results may help inform patient risk stratification.
Antibody cross-reactivity confounds testing for dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV). We evaluated anti-DENV and anti-ZIKV IgG detection using a multiplex serological platform (the pGOLD assay, Nirmidas, Palo Alto, CA) in patients from the Asunci on metropolitan area in Paraguay, which experiences annual DENV outbreaks but has reported few autochthonous ZIKV infections. Acute-phase sera were tested from 77 patients who presented with a suspected arboviral illness from January to May 2018. Samples were tested for DENV and ZIKV RNA by real-time reverse transcription-PCR, and for DENV nonstructural protein 1 with a lateral-flow immunochromatographic test. Forty-one patients (51.2%) had acute dengue; no acute ZIKV infections were detected. Sixty-five patients (84.4%) had anti-DENVneutralizing antibodies by focus reduction neutralization testing (FRNT50). Qualitative detection with the pGOLD assay demonstrated good agreement with FRNT50 (kappa = 0.74), and quantitative results were highly correlated between methods (P 0.001). Only three patients had anti-ZIKV-neutralizing antibodies at titers of 1:55-1:80, and all three had corresponding DENV-neutralizing titers 1:4,000. Hospitalized dengue cases had significantly higher anti-DENV IgG levels (P < 0.001). Anti-DENV IgG results from the pGOLD assay correlate well with FRNT, and quantitative results may inform patient risk stratification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据