4.4 Article

The importance of the margin of resection and radiotherapy in retroperitoneal liposarcoma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 221, 期 3, 页码 554-560

出版社

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.041

关键词

Retroperitoneal sarcoma; Liposarcoma; Radiotherapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 4018 patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma were analyzed. Positive surgical margins were associated with increased risk of death across all tumor size categories, while adjuvant radiotherapy was only linked to improved survival in patients with large tumors (>10 cm). Radiotherapy should be used cautiously in patients with smaller tumors.
Background: Prior studies evaluating the impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy on clinical outcomes in retroperitoneal liposarcoma have been underpowered. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients undergoing resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma from 2004 to 2016. Cox proportional hazards modeling stratified by tumor size was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. Results: 4018 patients met inclusion criteria. 251 had small (<5 cm), 574 intermediate (5-10 cm), and 3193 large (>10 cm) tumors. Positive surgical margins were correlated with risk of death across all tumor size categories (<5 cm HR 2.33, CI [1.20, 4.55]; 5-10 cm HR 1.49, CI [1.03, 2.14]; >10 cm HR 1.30, CI [1.12, 1.51]). Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved survival for patients with large tumors only (HR 0.75, CI [0.64, 0.89]). Conclusions: In retroperitoneal liposarcoma, adjuvant radiation is associated with improved survival only for patients with tumors larger than 10 cm. Radiation should be used sparingly in patients with smaller tumors. Summary: The use of radiotherapy in the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma remains controversial. We isolated retroperitoneal liposarcomas only and identified a survival benefit from radiotherapy treatment only in tumors larger than 10 cm and only in the adjuvant setting. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据