4.6 Article

Loss of Cxcr4 in Endometriosis Reduces Proliferation and Lesion Number while Increasing Intraepithelial Lymphocyte Infiltration

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 191, 期 7, 页码 1292-1302

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.04.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HD076422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperactivation of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in endometriosis is associated with disease progression. Targeted disruption of CXCR4 leads to reduced lesion development and suggests a role for epithelial CXCR4 in lesion immune evasion.
Hyperactivation of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis occurs in endometriosis; the therapeutic potential of treatments aimed at global inhibition of the axis was recently reported. Because CXCR4 is predominantly expressed on epithelial cells in the uterus, this study explored the effects of targeted disruption of CXCR4 in endometriosis lesions. Uteri derived from adult female mice homozygous for a floxed allele of CXCR4 and co-expressing Cre recombinase under control of progesterone receptor promoter were sutured onto the peritoneum of cycling host mice expressing the green fluorescent protein. Four weeks after endometriosis induction, significantly lower number of lesions developed in Cxcr4-conditional knockout lesions relative to those in controls (37.5% vs. 68.8%, respectively). In lesions that developed in Cxcr4-knockout, reduced epithelial proliferation was associated with a lower ratio of epithelial to total lesion area compared with controls. Furthermore, while CD3(+) lymphocytes were largely excluded from the epithelial compartment in control lesions, in Cxcr4-knockout lesions, CD3(+) lymphocytes infiltrated the Cxcr4-deficient epithelium in the diestrus and proestrus stages. Current data demonstrate that local CXCR4 expression is necessary for proliferation of the epithelial compartment of endometriosis lesions, that its downregulation compromises lesion numbers, and suggest a role for epithelial CXCR4 in lesion immune evasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据