4.5 Article

Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging and Single-Shot TSE DWI for Cholesteatoma Diagnostics

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 1305-1312

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7112

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LA 2804/6-1, LA 2804/12-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics. The results showed that TSE DWI had higher lesion conspicuity, fewer artifacts, and better overall subjective image quality compared to readout-segmented DWI. Additionally, TSE DWI exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity for cholesteatoma detection.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The high diagnostic value of DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics is undisputed. This study compares the diagnostic value of readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI for cholesteatoma diagnostics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with newly suspected cholesteatoma were examined with a dedicated protocol, including readout-segmented echo-planar DWI and single-shot TSE DWI at 1.5T. Acquisition parameters of both diffusion-weighted sequences were as follows: b=1000 s/mm,(2) axial and coronal section orientations, and section thickness of 3 mm. Image quality was evaluated by 2 readers on a 5-point Likert scale with respect to lesion conspicuity, the presence of susceptibility artifacts mimicking cholesteatomas, and overall subjective image quality. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using histology results as the gold standard. RESULTS: Twenty-five cases of histologically confirmed cholesteatomas were included in the study group. Lesion conspicuity was higher and fewer artifacts were found when using TSE DWI (both P<.001). The overall subjective image quality, however, was better with readout-segmented DWI. For TSE DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 92% (95% CI, 74%-99%) and 88% (95% CI, 69%-97%), respectively, while the specificity for both readers was 80% (95% CI, 28%-99%). For readout-segmented DWI, the sensitivity for readers 1 and 2 was 76% (95% CI, 55%-91%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-85%), while the specificity for both readers was 60% (95% CI, 15%-95%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of TSE DWI is advisable for cholesteatoma diagnostics and preferable over readout-segmented DWI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据