4.4 Article

Influences of mechanical pretreatment on the non-biological treatment of municipal wastewater by forward osmosis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 38, 期 18, 页码 2295-2304

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1256440

关键词

Biomimetic membrane; forward osmosis; membrane fouling; microfiltration; microsieving; wastewater treatment

资金

  1. VA SYD
  2. Sweden Water Research AB
  3. Svenskt Vatten
  4. VA-teknik Sodra
  5. VINNOVA [2014-00717]
  6. Danish Innovation Foundation [097-2012-4]
  7. IBISS
  8. MEMENTO [41060-0021B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Municipal wastewater treatment involves mechanical, biological and chemical treatment steps for protecting the environment from adverse effects. The biological treatment step consumes the most energy and can create greenhouse gases. This study investigates municipal wastewater treatment without the biological treatment step, including the effects of different pretreatment configurations, for example, direct membrane filtration before forward osmosis. Forward osmosis was tested using raw wastewater and wastewater subjected to different types of mechanical pretreatment, for example, microsieving and microfiltration permeation, as a potential technology for municipal wastewater treatment. Forward osmosis was performed using Aquaporin Inside and Hydration Technologies Inc. (HTI) membranes with NaCl as the draw solution. Both types of forward osmosis membranes were tested in parallel for the different types of pretreated feed and evaluated in terms of water flux and solute rejection, that is, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD7) and total and soluble phosphorus contents. The Aquaporin and HTI membranes achieved a stable water flux with rejection rates of more than 96% for BOD7 and total and soluble phosphorus, regardless of the type of mechanical pretreated wastewater considered. This result indicates that forward osmosis membranes can tolerate exposure to municipal waste water and that the permeate can fulfil the Swedish discharge limits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据