4.7 Article

Estimation of non-additive genetic variance in human complex traits from a large sample of unrelated individuals

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 786-798

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.02.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1113400, 1173790]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT180100186, FL180100072]
  3. University of Queensland's Research Computing Centre (RCC)
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1173790] Funding Source: NHMRC
  5. Australian Research Council [FL180100072, FT180100186] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a method to calculate non-additive genetic variance for complex traits by analyzing unrelated individuals with genome-wide SNP data instead of traditional data on relatives. The results show that genetic variance for complex traits is predominantly additive, and large sample sizes are needed to estimate epistatic variance accurately.
Non-additive genetic variance for complex traits is traditionally estimated from data on relatives. It is notoriously difficult to estimate without bias in non-laboratory species, including humans, because of possible confounding with environmental covariance among relatives. In principle, non-additive variance attributable to common DNA variants can be estimated from a random sample of unrelated individuals with genome-wide SNP data. Here, we jointly estimate the proportion of variance explained by additive (h(SNP)(2)), dominance (delta(2)(SNP)) and additive-by-additive (n(SNP)(2)) genetic variance in a single analysis model. We first show by simulations that our model leads to unbiased estimates and provide a new theory to predict standard errors estimated using either least-squares or maximum likelihood. We then apply the model to 70 complex traits using 254,679 unrelated individuals from the UK Biobank and 1.1Mgenotyped and imputed SNPs. We found strong evidence for additive variance (average across traits h(SNP)(-2) = 0:208). In contrast, the average estimate of delta(-2)(SNP) across traits was 0.001, implying negligible dominance variance at causal variants tagged by common SNPs. The average epistatic variance n(SNP)(-2) across the traits was 0.055, not significantly different from zero because of the large sampling variance. Our results provide new evidence that genetic variance for complex traits is predominantly additive and that sample sizes of many millions of unrelated individuals are needed to estimate epistatic variance with sufficient precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据