4.1 Article

Compounding sterile products during a personal protective equipment shortage

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY
卷 78, 期 14, 页码 1330-1335

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab112

关键词

COVID-19; disinfection; pandemic; patient safety; personal protective equipment; pharmacies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To ensure the continued availability of sterile compounded products during the COVID-19 pandemic, the pharmacy department has devised a plan for conserving personal protective equipment (PPE). This plan includes various conservation strategies such as staffing changes, communication, training adjustments, and reuse of select PPE, to ensure uninterrupted supply of compounded medications. Early planning and implementation of conservation strategies are crucial to ensure PPE availability for the compounding of sterile products.
Purpose. To describe our pharmacy department's plan for conservation of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to ensure continued availability of sterile compounded products. Summary. PPE shortages impacted hospitals throughout the nation in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic response. The PPE requirement for sterile compounding and need to maintain supplies within the pharmacy cleanroom are often overlooked. A sustained supply of PPE is critical to ensure an uninterrupted supply of compounded medications to our patient population. Multiple conservation strategies, including staffing changes, communication, adjustments to training, and even reuse of select PPE, can assist with conservation. Conclusion. PPE in pharmacy cleanrooms is critical for the continued provision of sterile compounds with appropriate beyond-use dates and effective patient care. Pharmacy departments must employ multiple conservation strategies to ensure PPE is available for continued compounding of sterile products, and early planning and implementation of conservation strategies are key.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据