4.7 Article

UV photolysis of diclofenac in water; kinetics, degradation pathway and environmental aspects

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 15, 页码 14908-14917

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6580-x

关键词

Diclofenac; UV photolysis; Degradation pathway; Biodegradability; Toxicity

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation through project entitled Environmental Implications of the Application of Nanomaterials in Water Purification Technologies (NanoWaP) [UIP-11-2013-7900]
  2. Croatian Science Foundation through project entitled Fate of pharmaceuticals in the environment and during advanced waste-water treatment (PharmaFate) [IP-09-2014-2353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the photolysis behavior of commonly used anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac (DCF) was investigated using UV-C and UV-A irradiation. In that purpose, DCF conversion kinetics, mineralization of organic content, biodegradability, and toxicity were monitored and compared. The results showed different kinetics of DCF conversion regarding the type of UV source applied. However, in both cases, the mineralization extent reached upon complete DCF conversion is rather low (<= 10 %), suggesting that the majority of DCF was transformed into by-products. Formation/degradation of main degradation by-products was monitored using high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS), whereas different profiles were obtained by UV-C and UV-A photolysis. The results of bioassays revealed that biodegradability of DCF solutions remained low through the applied treatments. The toxicity of irradiated DCF solutions was evaluated using Vibrio fischeri. A significant reduction of toxicity, especially in the case of UV-A radiation, was observed upon complete degradation of DCF. In addition to toxicity reduction, calculated Log K-OW values of DCF degradation by-products indicate their low potential for bioaccumulation (Log K-OW <= 3) in comparison to the parent substance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据