4.3 Article

A Comparative Evaluation of Capillary Electrophoresis, Cation-Exchange High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Screening of Hemoglobin Variants

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
卷 156, 期 3, 页码 445-454

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/AJCP/AQAA260

关键词

Hemoglobin variant; Capillary electrophoresis; Cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography; MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) showed the highest accuracy in screening for Hb variants in southern China, detecting all of the top ten common variants. MALDI-TOF MS is suitable for use as an auxiliary method rather than a stand-alone method.
Objectives: The present study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of capillary electrophoresis (CE), cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the screening of hemoglobin (Hb) variants prevalent in southern China. Methods: A total of 102 types of Hb variants in 1,083 variant carriers were identified over a 5-year period. These variants were analyzed by a CE method (Capillarys 3 TERA), a cation-exchange HPLC analyzer (Variant II Turbo 2.0), and a MALDI-TOF MS system (QuanTOF). Results: The presence of 85 (83.3%, 85/102), 84 (82.4%, 84/102), and 62 (60.8%, 62/102) Hb variants was detected by Capillarys 3 TERA, Variant II Turbo 2.0, and QuanTOF, respectively. Of the three methods, only Capillarys 3 TERA recognized all 10 of the most frequent Hb variants in southern China. There were six, two, and three Hb variants that can only be detected by Capillarys 3 TERA, Variant II Turbo 2.0, and QuanTOF, respectively. The detection limit of mass difference for QuanTOF was approximately 11 to 20 Da. Conclusions: MALDI-TOF MS is suitable for use as an auxiliary method rather than a stand-alone method for the screening of Hb variants prevalent in southern China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据