4.7 Article

Impacts of invasive ant-hemipteran interaction, edge effects and habitat complexities on the spatial distribution of ants in citrus orchards

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2021.107299

关键词

Food-for-protection; Invasive; Linepithema humile; Diaphorini citri; Edge effect; Citrus

资金

  1. Citrus Research Board [19-5500-501C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Argentine ant, an invasive species in the United States, disrupts natural ecosystems by displacing native ant species and associating with phloem-feeding insects. The presence of another invasive pest, Asian Citrus psyllid, as well as edge complexity, can impact ant activity rates and species richness within citrus groves. Understanding the spatial patterns of these pests can aid in future management practices for controlling their populations.
The Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, is an invasive ant species well established throughout subtropical climates in the United States. The Argentine ant disrupts natural ecosystems by displacing native ant species and associating with phloem-feeding insects, which they protect from natural enemies in exchange for honeydew excreted by the phloem-feeders. Thus, interactions between these ants and phloem-feeders can be an issue of critical importance in agroecosystems. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the presence or absence of another invasive pest, Asian Citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri, adjacent habitat types, and edge complexity impact the species richness, activity, and distribution of ants including the Argentine ant within citrus groves in southern California. When ACP were present and edge complexity was higher, ant activity rates were higher, yet we observed a decline in total ant species richness. Surrounding habitat type had no effect on ant activity or total ant species richness. Understanding the spatial patterns of both the Argentine ant and ACP can aid future management practices for controlling both Argentine ants and Asian citrus psyllid populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据