4.1 Article

Thermal plasticity of antioxidative activity in fresh adults of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

期刊

AFRICAN ENTOMOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 125-132

出版社

ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC SOUTHERN AFRICA
DOI: 10.4001/003.029.0125

关键词

oxygen; heat; cold; pupa

资金

  1. Czech Academy of Sciences [ASRT-16-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that the development of ladybirds in different temperature environments can affect the activity of antioxidant enzymes, with high sensitivity to temperatures above 35 degrees Celsius. The antioxidative activities of individuals from different temperatures gradually became similar after one day of adult life at medium temperature, indicating that the metabolic needs of the beetle organism during emerging from pupa seem to be stronger.
High and low developmental temperatures can induce physiological stress in insects, including oxidative stress that needs to be eliminated by increased antioxidant activity. Alien invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) possesses high toxicity and immunity defence abilities, but it is sensitive to temperatures above 35 degrees C. We quantified the activity of antioxidative enzymes in the adult ladybirds that spent the pupal stage at moderate, low and high temperatures that can cause a physiological stress. Total antioxidant (TAO) and Glutathione S-Transferase (GST) activities of ladybirds H. axyridis were highest in extracts from freshly emerged adults developed at low temperature (17 degrees C), moderate in beetles from medium temperature (26 degrees C) and lowest in beetles from high temperature (35 degrees C). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was highest at the medium temperature. After one day of adult life at the medium temperature, antioxidative activities of individuals originated from the three temperatures became similar: low for TAO and GST and high for SOD. Metabolic needs of the beetle organism during emerging from pupa seem to be stronger than reactions to diverse temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据