4.7 Article

An ecological risk assessment of heavy metal contamination in the surface sediments of Bosten Lake, northwest China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 7255-7265

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-6020-3

关键词

Heavy metals; Distribution; Sources and pollution; Potential ecology risk; Arid rump lake; Bosten Lake; Northwest China

资金

  1. Open Project of Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Lake Environment and Resources in Arid Zone, Xinjiang Normal University [X2014KL0106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501541]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bosten Lake, a typical rump lake in an oasis in northwest China, was chosen to evaluate the distribution, sources, pollution status, and potential ecological risk of heavy metals. Sediment samples were collected from the lake, and results showed that the values of the eight heavy metals all fell within the Second Soil National Standard, while the average and maximum values of the metals were higher than the background values of the study. Multivariate statistical analysis showed that sediment concentrations of Cd, Pb, Hg, and Zn were mainly influenced by man sources. In comparison, Cu, Ni, Cr, and As were primarily natural in origin. Enrichment factor analysis (EF) and the geo-accumulation index evaluation method (I (geo)) showed that Cd, Hg, and Pb fell under low and partial serious pollution levels, while Zn, As, Cr, Ni, and Cu mainly were characterized under no pollution and low pollution levels. The potential ecological hazards index (RI) showed that among the eight heavy metals, Pb, Hg, and Cd posed the highest potential ecological risk, with potential ecological hazards indices (RI) of 29.06, 27.71, and 21.54 %, respectively. These findings demonstrated that recent economic development in the area of the basin has led to heavy metal accumulation in the surface sediments of the lake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据