4.7 Article

Cerium tetraboride synthesized by a molten salt method and its Congo red adsorption performance

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 2226-2233

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2021.04.029

关键词

CeB4; Nanocrystal; Molten salt; Congo red; Adsorption

资金

  1. Frontier Science Key Program [QYZDY-SSW-JSC016]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully synthesized CeB4 nanocrystal powder via an inorganic molten salt synthesis route, demonstrating excellent adsorption performance for CR and good reusability. Experimental results showed that the adsorption of CR by CeB4 was pH dependent, with kinetic data following a pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and equilibrium adsorption represented by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models.
Widely used synthetic dyes are one of the main pollutants that contaminate water environments seriously. From the environmental perspective, efficient adsorption of these wastes such as Congo red (CR) is of great importance, and numbers of adsorbents including inorganic materials have been developed. Herein, a lanthanide tetraboride nanocrystal powder CeB4 with an average particle size of 50 nm synthesized for the first time via inorganic molten salt synthesis route using cerium fluoride (CeF3) and sodium borohydride (NaBH4) as the cerium and boron precursors in argon atmosphere exhibits good performance for the adsorption of CR. Essential effluence factors, such as initial pH value, contacting time, and initial concentration, were experimentally evaluated. The adsorption was pH dependent, and the kinetic data follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. It was also found that the equilibrium adsorption data could be represented by Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models, with a maximum capacity of 491.8 mg/g. On the basis of the adsorption-desorption experiments, CeB4 exhibits good reusability. (C) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据