4.8 Article

High-Efficiency Organic Solar Cells Based on a Low-Cost Fully Non-Fused Electron Acceptor

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 31, 期 27, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202101742

关键词

fully non‐ fused acceptors; low cost acceptors; nonfullerene acceptors; organic photovoltaics; tetrathiophene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51933001, 22075069, U1704137, 21734009]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [212300410002]
  3. Henan Province [19zx014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of tetrathiophene-based fully non-fused ring acceptors have been developed for efficient organic solar cells, with the ability to tune solubility and packing through lateral chain size adjustments. Incorporating 2-ethylhexyl chains enhances compatibility with donor polymers and achieves high power conversion efficiencies.
A series of tetrathiophene-based fully non-fused ring acceptors (4T-1, 4T-2, 4T-3, and 4T-4), which can be paired with the star donor polymer PBDB-T to fabricate highly efficient organic solar cells are developed. Tailoring the size of lateral chains can tune the solubility and packing mode of acceptor molecules in neat and blend films. It is found that the incorporation of 2-ethylhexyl chains can effectively change the compatibility with the donor polymer PBDB-T, and an encouraging power conversion efficiency of 10.15% is accomplished by 4T-3-based organic solar cells. It also presents good compatibility with the other polymer donor and an even higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.04% is achieved based on D18:4T-3 blend, which is the champion PCE for the fully non-fused acceptors. Importantly, these inexpensive tetrathiophene fully non-fused ring acceptors provide cost-effective photovoltaic performance. The results demonstrate a high photovoltaic performance from synthetically inexpensive materials could be achieved by the rational design of non-fused ring acceptor molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据