4.5 Article

Living arrangements after parental separation have minimal impact on mental health at age 7 years

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 110, 期 9, 页码 2586-2593

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15916

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. Pharmacy Foundation
  3. Egmont Foundation
  4. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation
  5. Augustinus Foundation
  6. Health Foundation
  7. Danish Medical Research Council
  8. Lundbeck Foundation
  9. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there were no statistically significant differences in child mental health at age 7 between joint physical custody, sole physical custody without a new partner, and sole physical custody with a new partner arrangements after parental separation.
Aim This study compared mental health after parental separation in 7-year-old children living in joint physical custody with sole physical custody family arrangements. Methods The study population included 39 661 children from the Danish National Birth Cohort, living in a nuclear family at age 6 months. Child mental health was measured at age 7 years with maternal reports of the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) operationalised as a high total score. Associations between living arrangements and mental health were analysed using logistic regression models, taking into account early childhood indicators of family relations, parental mental health and socioeconomic conditions. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the living arrangements after parental separation with joint physical custody having an odds ratio (OR) of 1.37 (95% CI 1.10-1.70), sole physical custody without a new partner OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.19-1.47) and OR 1.55 (95% CI 1.30-1.84) for sole physical custody with new partner, with children in a nuclear family as reference. Conclusion This study indicates that living arrangements after parental separation have a minimal influence on child mental health at age 7 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据