4.5 Article

Structural Setting and Kinematic Analysis of the Halaban Region, Eastern Arabian Shield, Saudi Arabia

期刊

ACTA GEOLOGICA SINICA-ENGLISH EDITION
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 750-760

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-6724.14690

关键词

vorticity analysis; strain analysis; deformation; Halaban area; Eastern Arabian Shield

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1440-011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research utilizes the vorticity analysis technique and kinematic analysis to study the relationship between different lithological units and tectonic setting in the Halaban region. The results show the presence of simple shear deformation and no significant volume change during deformation.
The vorticity analysis technique was applied to measure the different lithological units, such as schist, metagranite and metavolcano-sedimentary rocks, which are present in the Halaban region. This work aims to interpret the relationship between the different lithologies and the tectonic setting, in order to elucidate the nature of kinematic analysis in the Halaban region. The kinematic analyses were applied to feldspar porphyroclasts, quartz and hornblende for twenty-six samples. The kinematic vorticity number (W-m) for deformed rocks in the study area ranged from similar to 0.6 to 0.9. The direction of the long axes for finite strain data (X axes) revealed a WNW trend with shallow dipping. The direction of the short axes for finite strain data (Z axes) were represented by vertical with associated horizontal foliation. The results of the kinematic vorticity and strain analyses are characterized by simple shear with different degrees of deformation in the Halaban region. Furthermore, our finite strain data shows no significant volume change during deformation. The subhorizontal foliation was synchronized with thrusting and deformation. Furthermore, throughout the overlying nappes, the same attitudes of tectonic contacts are observable, the nappes in the orogens being formed from simple shear deformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据