4.8 Article

Segregation-Enhanced Epitaxy of Borophene on Ir(111) by Thermal Decomposition of Borazine

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 7421-7429

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00819

关键词

borophene; two-dimensional materials; iridium; thermal catalytic decomposition; segregation; epitaxial growth; chemical vapor deposition

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [278162697, 277146847]
  2. Interdisciplinary Center for Analytics on the Nanoscale (ICAN) of the University of Duisburg-Essen
  3. DFG [RI_00313, 324659309]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports an alternative method for synthesizing large single-phase borophene domains using segregation-enhanced epitaxy, investigating the process of borophene formation at subsurface and surface levels, and revealing the unique structural and electronic properties of borophene.
Like other 2D materials, the boron-based borophene exhibits interesting structural and electronic properties. While borophene is typically prepared by molecular beam epitaxy, we report here on an alternative way of synthesizing large single-phase borophene domains by segregation-enhanced epitaxy. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy shows that borazine dosing at 1100 degrees C onto Ir(111) yields a boron-rich surface without traces of nitrogen. At high temperatures, the borazine thermally decomposes, nitrogen desorbs, and boron diffuses into the substrate. Using time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, we show that during cooldown the subsurface boron segregates back to the surface where it forms borophene. In this case, electron diffraction reveals a (6 x 2) reconstructed borophene chi(6)-polymorph, and scanning tunneling spectroscopy suggests a Dirac-like behavior. Studying the kinetics of borophene formation in low energy electron microscopy shows that surface steps are bunched during the borophene formation, resulting in elongated and extended borophene domains with exceptional structural order.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据