4.8 Article

Thermoplasmonic-Assisted Cyclic Cleavage Amplification for Self-Validating Plasmonic Detection of SARS-CoV-2

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 7536-7546

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00957

关键词

thermoplasmonics; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; plasmonics; biosensor; cyclic cleavage amplification

资金

  1. National Research Program (NRP 78 Covid-19) of the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [198258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of sensitive virus sensing systems for detecting infections and preventing transmission. The TP-DMT approach combines amplification-based and amplification-free methods for rapid and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2, showing potential for clinical infection screening and environmental monitoring.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has penetrated every populated patch of the globe and sows destruction in our daily life. Reliable and sensitive virus sensing systems are therefore of vital importance for timely infection detection and transmission prevention. Here we present a thermoplasmonic-assisted dual-mode transducing (TP-DMT) concept, where an amplification-free-based direct viral RNA detection and an amplification-based cyclic fluorescence probe cleavage (CFPC) detection collaborated to provide a sensitive and self-validating plasmonic nanoplatform for quantifying trace amounts of SARS-CoV-2 within 30 min. In the CFPC detection, endonuclease IV recognized the synthetic abasic site and cleaved the fluorescent probes in the hybridized duplex. The nanoscale thermoplasmonic heating dehybridized the shortened fluorescent probes and facilitated the cyclical binding-cleavage-dissociation (BCD) process, which could deliver a highly sensitive amplification-based response. This TP-DMT approach was successfully validated by testing clinical COVID-19 patient samples, which indicated its potential applications in fast clinical infection screening and real-time environmental monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据