4.8 Article

Structural Complexity of Graphene Oxide: The Kirigami Model

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 15, 页码 18255-18263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c01157

关键词

graphene oxide structure; solid-state NMR; 2D NMR; 2D C-13-H-1 heteronuclear correlation NMR; kirigami; furanic carbons

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. LIEF [LE0989541]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australia [GNT1139060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigation of highly oxidized graphene oxide using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed previously undiscovered structural complexity, including new chemical moieties. Discrepancies between NMR analysis and microscopy/dynamic light scattering results led to the proposal of a kirigami model as a resolution. This work is expected to advance fundamental understanding and control of graphene oxide structure.
Investigation of highly oxidized graphene oxide (GO) by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has revealed an exceptional level of hitherto undiscovered structural complexity. A number of chemical moieties were observed for the first time, such as terminal esters, furanic carbons, phenolic carbons, and three distinct aromatic and two distinct alkoxy carbon moieties. Quantitative on-edimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) C-13{H-1} NMR spectroscopy established the relative populations and connectivity of these different moieties to provide a consistent local chemical structure model. An inferred 2 nm GO sheet size from a very large (similar to 20%) edge carbon fraction by NMR analysis is at odds with the >20 nm sheet size determined from microscopy and dynamic light scattering. A proposed kirigami model where extensive internal cuts/tears in the basal plane provide the necessary edge sites is presented as a resolution to these divergent results. We expect this work to expand the fundamental understanding of this complex material and enable greater control of the GO structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据