4.8 Article

Rational Engineering of the DNA Walker Amplification Strategy by Using a Au@Ti3C2@PEI-Ru(dcbpy)32+ Nanocomposite Biosensor for Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp Gene

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 19816-19824

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c04453

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; RNA-dependent RNA polymerase; MXene-Ti3C2; DNA walker; electrochemiluminescence; biosensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705061]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Discipline (Laboratory) [ZDXKA2016017]
  3. Innovation Capacity Development Plan of Jiangsu Province [BM2018023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel Au@Ti3C2@PEI-Ru(dcbpy)(3)(2+) nanocomposite-based ECL biosensor was designed for the sensitive detection of the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene. The sensor showed a wide detection range and a low limit of detection, indicating its great potential for clinical medical applications. The use of a DNA walker amplification strategy also showed promising results for other detection methods.
The detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is crucial for preventing and controlling infectious diseases and disease treatment. In this work, a Au@Ti3C2@PEI-Ru(dcbpy)(3)(2+) nanocomposite-based electrochemiluminescence (ECL) biosensor was rationally designed, which realized sensitive detection of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, a DNA walker was also used to excise the hairpin DNAs under the action of Nb.BbvCI endonuclease. Furthermore, model DNA-Ag nanoclusters (model DNA-AgNCs) were used to quench the initial ECL signal. As a result, the ECL biosensor was used to sensitively detect the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp gene with a detection range of 1 fM to 100 pM and a limit of detection of 0.21 fM. It was indicated that the ECL biosensor had a great application potential for clinical medical detection. Furthermore, the DNA walker amplification also played a reliable candidate strategy for other detection methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据