4.8 Article

Importance of Crystallographic Sites on Sodium-Ion Extraction from NASICON-Structured Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 14325-14333

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c01663

关键词

sodium-ion batteries; NASICON-structured cathodes; the V5+/V4+ redox couple; high-voltage cathodes; sodium-ion diffusion barriers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972029, 51772029]
  2. Teli Young Scholars of Beijing Institute of Technology
  3. Experimental Center of Advanced Materials in Beijing Institute of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compares the extraction/insertion behavior of sodium ions in two isostructural compounds and finds that the voltage of the V5+/V4+ redox couple in partially substituted Na3V2(PO4)3 is lower due to excessive diffusion activation energy.
The V4+/V3+ (3.4 V) redox couple has been well-documented in cathode material Na3V2(PO4)(3) for sodium-ion batteries. Recently, partial cation substitution at the vanadium site of Na3V2(PO4)(3) has been actively explored to access the V5+/V4+ redox couple to achieve high energy density. However, the V5+/V4+ redox couple in partially substituted Na3V2(PO4)(3) has a voltage far below its theoretical voltage in Na3V2(PO4)(3), and the access of the V5+/V4+ redox reaction is very limited. In this work, we compare the extraction/insertion behavior of sodium ions from/into two isostructural compounds of Na3VGa(PO4)(3) and Na3VAl(PO4)(3), found that, by DFT calculations, the lower potential of the V5+/V4+ redox couple in Na3VM(PO4)(3) (M = Ga or Al) than that in Na3V2(PO4)(3) is because of the extraction/insertion of sodium ions through the V5+/V4+ redox reaction at different crystallographic sites, that is, sodium ions extracting from the Na(2) site in Na3VM(PO4) 3 while from the Na(1) site in Na3V2(PO4)(3), and further evidenced that the full access of the V5+/V4+ redox reaction is restrained by the excessive diffusion activation energy in Na3VM(PO4)(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据