4.8 Review

The Enzymes of the Rifamycin Antibiotic Resistome

期刊

ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 2065-2075

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FRN-148463]
  2. Canada Research Chair
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rifamycin antibiotics, including rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine, are derived from natural rifamycins and primarily used to treat mycobacterial infections such as tuberculosis. These antibiotics inhibit bacterial RNA polymerase by binding to the beta-subunit, leading to cell death. Resistance to rifamycin antibiotics mainly arises from point mutations in RNA polymerase among clinical strains, while environmental mycobacteria and actinomycetes show a richer and diverse rifamycin resistome with various enzymatic mechanisms.
CONSPECTUS: Rifamycin antibiotics include the WHO essential medicines rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine. These are semisynthetic derivatives of the natural product rifamycins, originally isolated from the soil bacterium Amycolatopsis rifamycinica. These antibiotics are primarily used to treat mycobacterial infections, including tuberculosis. Rifamycins act by binding to the beta-subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase, inhibiting transcription, which results in cell death. These antibiotics consist of a naphthalene core spanned by a polyketide ansa bridge. This structure presents a unique 3D configuration that engages RNA polymerase through a series of hydrogen bonds between hydroxyl groups linked to the naphthalene core and C21 and C23 of the ansa bridge. This binding occurs not in the enzyme active site where template-directed RNA synthesis occurs but instead in the RNA exit tunnel, thereby blocking productive formation of full-length RNA. In their clinical use to treat tuberculosis, resistance to rifamycin antibiotics arises principally from point mutations in RNA polymerase that decrease the antibiotic's affinity for the binding site in the RNA exit tunnel. In contrast, the rifamycin resistome of environmental mycobacteria and actinomycetes is much richer and diverse. In these organisms, rifamycin resistance includes many different enzymatic mechanisms that modify and alter the antibiotic directly, thereby inactivating it. These enzymes include ADP ribosyltransferases, glycosyltransferases, phosphotransferases, and monooxygenases. ADP ribosyltransferases catalyze group transfer of ADP ribose from the cofactor NAD+, which is more commonly deployed for metabolic redox reactions. ADP ribose is transferred to the hydroxyl linked to C23 of the antibiotic, thereby sterically blocking productive interaction with RNA polymerase. Like ADP ribosyltransferases, rifamycin glycosyl transferases also modify the hydroxyl of position C23 of rifamycins, transferring a glucose moiety from the donor molecule UDP-glucose. Unlike other antibiotic resistance kinases that transfer the gamma-phosphate of ATP to inactivate antibiotics such as aminoglycosides or macrolides, rifamycin phosphotransferases are ATP-dependent dikinases. These enzymes transfer the beta-phosphate of ATP to the C21 hydroxyl of the rifamycin ansa bridge. The result is modification of a critical RNA polymerase binding group that blocks productive complex formation. On the other hand, rifamycin monooxygenases are FAD-dependent enzymes that hydroxylate the naphthoquinone core. The result of this modification is untethering of the ansa chain from the naphthyl moiety, disrupting the essential 3D shape necessary for productive RNA polymerase binding and inhibition that leads to cell death. All of these enzymes have homologues in bacterial metabolism that either are their direct precursors or share common ancestors to the resistance enzyme. The diversity of these resistance mechanisms, often redundant in individual bacterial isolates, speaks to the importance of protecting RNA polymerase from these compounds and validates this enzyme as a critical antibiotic target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据