4.4 Article

Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 549-558

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S298591

关键词

percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Endo-TLIF; MIS-TLIF; lumbar spondylolisthesis; clinical outcome

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672200, 81871804]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project (CN) [2019YFC0121400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the preliminary postoperative outcomes of Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, finding that Endo-TLIF had less blood loss and shorter ambulation time, with significant early improvement. There were no significant differences in terms of interbody fusion rates between the two groups, and no serious postoperative complications were observed.
Purpose: To compare the preliminary postoperative outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: Sixty-two patients with single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis received EndoTLIF and MIS-TLIF were enrolled in present study. Perioperative parameters, including operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), interoperative fluoroscopy time, ambulation time and operative complications were recorded, respectively. The results of clinical metrics such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were obtained, respectively. Postoperative fusion rates were assessed by clinical fusion and CT at 12-month after surgery. Results: No significant differences were found in the demographic data between the two groups. Compared with MIS-TLIF group, Endo-TLIF group had similar operative time, less intraoperative blood loss and shorter ambulation time but longer duration of X-ray radiation. The postoperative VAS scores of back pain, ODI and JOA score were significantly improved comparing with the preoperative scores in two groups, but the Endo-TLIF group showed more significant improvement in the early follow-up (P < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of the interbody fusion rate between the two groups. Meanwhile, no serious postoperative complications were observed in the study. Conclusion: Compared with MIS-TLIF, Endo-TLIF technique showed relatively faster recovery and better outcomes in terms of early curative effect, especially in 6 months after operation. However, intraoperative repeated fluoroscopy could result in highly cumulative radiation and longer operation time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据