4.3 Article

Economic burden of eating disorders in South Korea

期刊

JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40337-021-00385-w

关键词

Eating disorder; Prevalence; Burden of disease; Bulimia nervosa; Anorexia nervosa

资金

  1. Korean Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI18C0446]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the treatment prevalence and economic burden of eating disorders in South Korea between 2010 and 2015, finding an increase in treatment prevalence and medical expenditures over the years. The total economic cost of eating disorders was USD 5455626 in 2015, with the highest economic cost and prevalence observed in the 20-29 age group.
Background Few studies have investigated the epidemiology of eating disorders using national representative data. In this study, we investigated the treatment prevalence and economic burden of eating disorders in South Korea. Methods The aim of this study was to estimate the treatment prevalence and the medical expenditure of diagnosed eating disorders (ICD F50.x) in South Korea between 2010 and 2015. We also examined the economic costs of eating disorders, including the direct medical cost, direct non-medical costs, and indirect costs, in order to calculate the economic burden of such disorders. Results The total treatment prevalence of eating disorders in South Korea was 12.02 people (per 100,000) in 2010, and 13.28 in 2015. The cost of medical expenditures due to eating disorders increased from USD 1229724 in 2010 to USD 1843706 in 2015. The total economic cost of eating disorders was USD 5455626 in 2015. In 2015, the economic cost and prevalence of eating disorders was the highest in the 20-29 age group. Conclusions The results showed the eating disorders are insufficiently managed in the medical insurance system. Further research is therefore warranted to better understand the economic burdens of each type of eating disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据