4.6 Article

New Species Can Broaden Myelin Research: Suitability of Little Skate, Leucoraja erinacea

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life11020136

关键词

myelin evolution; little skate; oligodendrocytes; Schwann cells; elasmobranch; spinal cord; optic nerve; electron microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although studies have primarily focused on mice and zebrafish, research on myelination in the little skate provides a broader understanding of this process. The similarities in myelination features between skate hatchlings and adult skates lay the foundation for further exploration of axon-myelinating cell communication and related mechanisms.
Although myelinated nervous systems are shared among 60,000 jawed vertebrates, studies aimed at understanding myelination have focused more and more on mice and zebrafish. To obtain a broader understanding of the myelination process, we examined the little skate, Leucoraja erinacea. The reasons behind initiating studies at this time include: the desire to study a species belonging to an out group of other jawed vertebrates; using a species with embryos accessible throughout development; the availability of genome sequences; and the likelihood that mammalian antibodies recognize homologs in the chosen species. We report that the morphological features of myelination in a skate hatchling, a stage that supports complex behavioral repertoires needed for survival, are highly similar in terms of: appearances of myelinating oligodendrocytes (CNS) and Schwann cells (PNS); the way their levels of myelination conform to axon caliber; and their identity in terms of nodal and paranodal specializations. These features provide a core for further studies to determine: axon-myelinating cell communication; the structures of the proteins and lipids upon which myelinated fibers are formed; the pathways used to transport these molecules to sites of myelin assembly and maintenance; and the gene regulatory networks that control their expressions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据