4.7 Article

Spatial variations in daytime methane and carbon dioxide emissions in two urban landscapes, Sakai, Japan

期刊

URBAN CLIMATE
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100798

关键词

CH4 flux; CO2 flux; Urban area; Eddy covariance; Footprint model; Mobile measurement

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [18H03362]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H03362] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that sewage plants, oil refineries, and natural gas facilities in urban centers are hotspots for CH4 emissions, while CO2 fluxes are larger in commercial and industrial areas. Vegetated areas were nearly CO2-neutral during the daytime.
To obtain an accurate understanding of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) emissions from urban areas, it is important to estimate their spatial variations because the heterogeneous nature of urban land use results in different emissions patterns. We measured CH4 and CO2 fluxes from two urban landscapes in Japan with the eddy covariance method and evaluated the spatial distributions of fluxes by combining flux footprint analysis and mobile measurements of gas concentrations. CH4 hotspots were identified at sewage plants, oil refineries, and natural gas facilities in the urban center. The fluxes (60 +/- 65 nmol m(-2) s(-1)) affected by hotspots were higher than those in the suburban and residential areas (22 +/- 30 nmol m(-2) s(-1)). High CH4 concentrations of up to 5130 ppb from the hotspots were also observed in the mobile measurements. The measured fluxes showed that the study area generally acted as a CH4 source irrespective of the presence of hotspots. The mobile measurements suggested several CH4 sources: gas leaks from natural gas networks, sewage pipes, gas-powered air conditioners, and moats. The CO2 fluxes were larger in commercial and industrial areas than residential and suburb areas, and fluxes from vegetated areas were nearly CO2-neutral in the daytime.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据