4.6 Article

Endurance Training Improves Oxygen Uptake and Endurance Capacity in Patients With Moderate to Severe Valvular Disease

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.627224

关键词

endurance training; valve disease; peak VO2; Watt(max); endurance capacity

资金

  1. Austrian Heart Research Fund/Austria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endurance training significantly increased both peak oxygen uptake (peakVO(2)) and endurance capacity in patients with moderate-severe valvular heart disease.
Aim: Peak oxygen uptake (peakVO(2)) is one of the strongest predictors of survival in patients with valvular heart disease. The purpose of this study was to determine whether endurance training improves peakVO(2) and endurance capacity in patients with moderate-severe aortic and mitral valve disease. Methods: 30 patients with moderate-severe valvular heart disease were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of endurance training (TG) (n = 16) or standard care (SC) (n = 14). PeakVO(2) and maximum working capacity (Watt(max)) were assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, as well as submaximal endurance test at 80% of peakVO(2) at baseline and after 12 weeks. Results: There was a significant improvement in peakVO(2) from 27.2 +/- 5.9 ml/kg to 30.4 +/- 6.3 ml/kg (P < 0.001) in TG compared to the SC (peakVO(2) from 24.6 +/- 4.4 to 24.7 +/- 3.8) and in the Watt(max) from 151.8 +/- 41.0 Watt to 171.2 +/- 49.7 Watt in the TG compared to the SC (152.9 +/- 35.6 Watt to 149.2 +/- 28.4 Watt). The endurance capacity increased significantly from 17.0 +/- 9.4 min to 32.8 +/- 16.8 min (p = 0.003) in the TG compared to the SC (11.7 +/- 6.2 min to 11.2 +/- 7.6 min). The heart rate during the endurance test decreased in the TG from 154 +/- 14 b/min to 142 +/- 20 b/min for the same workload. No changes could be seen in the SC. Conclusion: Endurance training in patients with moderate to severe valvular heart disease increased significantly the peakVO(2) as well as the endurance capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据