4.7 Article

Overcoming barriers to the registration of new plant varieties under the DUS system

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-01840-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The DUS system introduced by UPOV in 1961 for protecting intellectual property of new plant varieties needs urgent review due to increasing demand for new plant varieties, as highlighted in a study evaluating 805 UK barley varieties. The study suggests shifting towards a genomic system for future plant registration.
Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability (DUS) is an intellectual property system introduced in 1961 by the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) for safeguarding the investment and rewarding innovation in developing new plant varieties. Despite the rapid advancement in our understanding of crop biology over the past 60 years, the DUS system has changed little and is still largely dependent upon a set of morphological traits for testing candidate varieties. As the demand for more plant varieties increases, the barriers to registration of new varieties become more acute and thus require urgent review to the system. To highlight the challenges and remedies in the current system, we evaluated a comprehensive panel of 805 UK barley varieties that span the entire history of DUS testing. Our findings reveal the system deficiencies such as inconsistencies in DUS traits across environments, limitations in DUS trait combinatorial space, and inadequacies in currently available DUS markers. We advocate the concept of genomic DUS and provide evidence for a shift towards a robust genomics-enabled registration system for new crop varieties. Yang et al. use a genomic approach to evaluate a panel of 805 UK barley varieties and the value of the DUS system for plant registration. Their findings suggest that morphological traits are not appropriate for registering new barley varieties, and suggest that a genomic system should be developed for future use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据