4.7 Article

Long-Term Tacrolimus Blood Trough Level and Patient Survival in Adult Liver Transplantation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jpm11020090

关键词

Cox's model; immunosuppressant; liver transplantation; survival; tacrolimus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of tacrolimus blood concentration after five years of liver transplant on long-term patient survival outcomes, with findings suggesting that patients with a tacrolimus trough level of 4.6-10.2 ng/mL had significantly better long-term survival. The recommendation from the study is that adult liver transplant patients should maintain a tacrolimus level of no lower than 4.6 ng/mL for optimal long-term survival.
Tacrolimus is the most widely used immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. However, the ideal long-term target level for these patients is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of tacrolimus blood concentration five years after LT on long-term patient survival outcomes in adult LT recipients. Patients who underwent LT between January 2004 and July 2014 at a tertiary medical center were included in this study (n = 189). The mean tacrolimus blood concentrations of each patient during the fifth year after LT were recorded and the overall survival rate was determined. A multivariate analysis of factors associated with long-term survival was conducted using a Cox's model. The median follow-up period was 9.63 years, and 144 patients (76.2%) underwent live donor LT. Sixteen patients died within 5 years of LT. In the Cox's model, patients with a mean tacrolimus blood trough level of 4.6-10.2 ng/mL had significantly better long-term survival than those with a mean tacrolimus blood trough level outside this range (estimated hazard ratio = 4.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.34-16.9, p = 0.016). Therefore, a tacrolimus level no lower than 4.6 ng/mL would be recommended in adult LT patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据