4.6 Review

Sporothrix brasiliensis: A Review of an Emerging South American Fungal Pathogen, Its Related Disease, Presentation and Spread in Argentina

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof7030170

关键词

cat-transmitted sporotrichosis; zoonosis; Sporothrix brasiliensis; virulence factors; diagnosis; therapy; vaccines; Argentina

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnica (ANPCyT) [PICT 2018-02186]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sporotrichosis caused by Sporothrix schenckii and related species is common in Latin America, with a recent increase in cases in Argentina linked to zoonotic transmission. Molecular identification revealed Sporothrix brasiliensis as the causative agent, leading to outbreaks in cats and humans. The study aims to investigate sources of infection, environmental hotspots, treatment strategies, clinical aspects, host-pathogen interactions, and potential vaccine candidates in Argentina from 2011-2019.
Sporotrichosis, caused by Sporothrix schenckii and related species, is the most frequent implantation mycosis in Latin America. In Argentina, over the last 8 years, there have been 0.16 new cases per month of feline sporotrichosis in 2011, increasing to 0.75 cases per month in 2019 and involving zoonotic transmission to humans. Molecular identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detected Sporothrix brasiliensis in these feline and zoonotic outbreaks. This study will focus on different feline and human sporotrichosis outbreaks caused by S. brasiliensis in Argentina during 2011-2019. We will address the sources of infection and environmental hotspots, as well as the application of several treatment strategies for improving the pharmacotherapy of the different clinical forms of the disease. Finally, we will provide a detailed summary of the clinical aspects and new advances in host-pathogen interactions, virulence factors and immune response, focusing on state-of-the-art diagnostic tools and potential vaccine candidates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据